Mangum, Green Co., Okla [Oklahoma]
Nov. 12th [18]94
Dr. John Billings
Washington, D.C.
Dear Sir
I have in my possession a Skeleton of a man that was found in a cave in the mountain in the west part of this AV[?] found by Mr. Braidy a Lofer Wolf skinner.* The Skeleton looks to be about forty years old [sic] that is the man lost his life about forty years ago the bones are all sound as it was found in a very dry place found with it an old filint [Flint] Lock Rifle gun[,] five files, Sword and Several othe[r] trinkets – though some of the thing[s] greatly damaged by rust you can plainly see what they are
Judge Eastorr of Vernon Tex called on me to see the Skeleton and gun +c. and thinks it is the remains of one Col. Blacks [sic] party that started out in 1836 to explore this country all of this party were killed and captured by Indians save three only three returned to there [sic] Homes to tell there [sic] story
I am offered $10.00 for the outfit here but I want more I will box it up and ship it to you for $25.00
Awaiting your Answer
Respectfully
A.R. Wilson
Maugum, Okla
*The “loafer wolf” was also known as the Great Plains or “buffalo wolf” due to its enormous size and fearsome reputation. Early settlers in the west put a $10 bounty on the buffalo wolf and it was extinct by 1926. Wolf subspecies/taxonomy: canis lupus nubilus.
Friday, November 12, 2010
Thursday, November 11, 2010
Armistice Day and Veteran's Day
Armistice Day was established in 1926 to commemorate the end of World War I on November 11 at 11 am - 11-11-11. In 1954, it became Veteran's Day.
You can see other World War I photographs on our Flickr site.
Letter of the Day: November 11 (1 of 2)
Surgeon General’s Office
Army Medical Museum
Washington D.C. Nov. 11” 1870.
Sir:
I have the honor to report that the following specimens in the Army Medical Museum are available for exchange with other Museums and Instititutions.
Illustrating Gunshot Injuries
Four illustrations of gunshot injuries of the shoulder joint.
Thirty four specimens of gunshot injuries of the shaft of humerus.
Fourteen specimens of gunshot injuries of the elbow joint.
Nineteen specimens of gunshot injuries of the forearm.
Six specimens of gunshot injuries of the carpal articulations and hand.
Sixty three specimens of gunshot injuries of the femur.
One hundred and twenty one specimens of injuries of the knee joint.
One hundred and seventeen specimens of gunshot injuries of the bones of the leg.
Sixty two specimens of gunshot injuries of the bones of the ankle and foot.
Twenty two leaden bullets
From Prof. William Gibson’s Cabinet.
Twenty two oil paintings.
Five femurs, three bones of the leg, and one humerus.
Anatomical.
Four preparations of the heart, purchased in Paris.
Miscellaneous.
Once Indian medicine drum and rattle.
One Assiniboine Indian rattle.
One deformed hoof.
Three entomological specimens.
Six specimens of Indian food, of which samples have been sent to the Agricultural Department, Smithsonian Institution, and to the Springfield Museum.
“A right boot, showing the wound of entrance and exit of a bullet passing nearly transversely through the middle of the foot”
I am sir,
Very respectfully
Your obedient servant,
E.T. Parker
Hospital Steward U.S.A.
Assistant Surgeon George A. Otis.
U.S. Army
Curator Army Medical Museum
Army Medical Museum
Washington D.C. Nov. 11” 1870.
Sir:
I have the honor to report that the following specimens in the Army Medical Museum are available for exchange with other Museums and Instititutions.
Illustrating Gunshot Injuries
Four illustrations of gunshot injuries of the shoulder joint.
Thirty four specimens of gunshot injuries of the shaft of humerus.
Fourteen specimens of gunshot injuries of the elbow joint.
Nineteen specimens of gunshot injuries of the forearm.
Six specimens of gunshot injuries of the carpal articulations and hand.
Sixty three specimens of gunshot injuries of the femur.
One hundred and twenty one specimens of injuries of the knee joint.
One hundred and seventeen specimens of gunshot injuries of the bones of the leg.
Sixty two specimens of gunshot injuries of the bones of the ankle and foot.
Twenty two leaden bullets
From Prof. William Gibson’s Cabinet.
Twenty two oil paintings.
Five femurs, three bones of the leg, and one humerus.
Anatomical.
Four preparations of the heart, purchased in Paris.
Miscellaneous.
Once Indian medicine drum and rattle.
One Assiniboine Indian rattle.
One deformed hoof.
Three entomological specimens.
Six specimens of Indian food, of which samples have been sent to the Agricultural Department, Smithsonian Institution, and to the Springfield Museum.
“A right boot, showing the wound of entrance and exit of a bullet passing nearly transversely through the middle of the foot”
I am sir,
Very respectfully
Your obedient servant,
E.T. Parker
Hospital Steward U.S.A.
Assistant Surgeon George A. Otis.
U.S. Army
Curator Army Medical Museum
Letter of the Day: November 11 (2 of 2)
Ward’s Natural Science Establishment,
College Avenue (opposite University),
Rochester, N.Y., Nov. 11 1884
Dr. John Billings, Washington.
Dear Sir,
I have for the past fortnight been greatly busy in packing and shipping 10 car-loads of specimens to the World’s Exposition at New Orleans.
And now I must follow them day after tomorrow, to stay there for six weeks, or until New Years. This leaves me no time to go through my stock and my late African acquisitions and pick out things which I can offer you.
I must request you to kindly wait on me for this until my return from the South, when I will give it prompt attention.
Respectfully yours
Henry A. Ward.
We have set aside for you the Elephant skull – to ship to you with other things later.
College Avenue (opposite University),
Rochester, N.Y., Nov. 11 1884
Dr. John Billings, Washington.
Dear Sir,
I have for the past fortnight been greatly busy in packing and shipping 10 car-loads of specimens to the World’s Exposition at New Orleans.
And now I must follow them day after tomorrow, to stay there for six weeks, or until New Years. This leaves me no time to go through my stock and my late African acquisitions and pick out things which I can offer you.
I must request you to kindly wait on me for this until my return from the South, when I will give it prompt attention.
Respectfully yours
Henry A. Ward.
We have set aside for you the Elephant skull – to ship to you with other things later.
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
Megan and Michelle - New interns first blog post
Hello! Our names are Megan and Michelle. We are interns from
Image from Sadler TW. 2006. Langman's Medical Embryology, 10th ed. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Letter of the day debate continues...
The game is afoot!
Since sending out my last update, I have heard back from several folks about what could have caused the muscular atrophy of our mystery patient. Some suggestions include sudden spinal injuries, early undiagnosed polio, or psychological conversion.
As many of you know, my background is in cultural studies from the Gilded Age, particularly concepts of masculinity. Initially I had also thought that our patient might be suffering from a psychological illness, especially as Dr. Leale made reference to “the insane.” Much of my own research has focused around neurasthenia, which had reached “epidemic” proportions in the US in the 1880s. It was discovered by George Beard in 1869 and was what we would consider extreme exhaustion. Men all over the United States were suffering severe, incapacitating physical and mental breakdowns (it was considered so characteristic of Americans that William James, Harvard professor and brother of Henry James, called it ‘Americanitis’). Most historians now believe that there were numerous cultural factors that led to this “epidemic”, but it would not be an exaggeration to say that most prominent Americans at the time deeply feared this mysterious mental and physical weakening of American men (this would in turn, they believed, weaken the country, making it susceptible to invasion, etc.). All this is by way of saying that though doctors did not understand the causes of mental illness at the time, they were certainly aware that it could have physical repercussions. I feel confident that the experts brought in on this particular case would have considered this possibility.
Also, while I do agree that unwanted marriage could have been a trigger for such a psychological reaction, I think in this case we do not know enough about the patient’s background to make a generalization that a marriage would have been formally or informally “arranged.”. The consultation of so many experts from this time suggests to me that 1) this was a relatively wealthy patient, and/or 2) that the patient’s condition was so unusual that it attracted medical attention. This is important because negotiations of marriage at this time depended very much on socio-economic status, class, race, and numerous other factors. Certain groups, what would have been termed “classes,” of people would certainly have been involved in more “arranged” marriages because of family reasons, religion, etc. But we just don’t know in this case.
The other possibility that occurred to me was that marriage might have been prevented because there was no possibility of consummating the marriage or having children. Depending on how the illness was presenting, doctors could have made this diagnosis. I can think of many circumstances where this would have led to the dissolution of an engagement.
Since sending out my last update, I have heard back from several folks about what could have caused the muscular atrophy of our mystery patient. Some suggestions include sudden spinal injuries, early undiagnosed polio, or psychological conversion.
As many of you know, my background is in cultural studies from the Gilded Age, particularly concepts of masculinity. Initially I had also thought that our patient might be suffering from a psychological illness, especially as Dr. Leale made reference to “the insane.” Much of my own research has focused around neurasthenia, which had reached “epidemic” proportions in the US in the 1880s. It was discovered by George Beard in 1869 and was what we would consider extreme exhaustion. Men all over the United States were suffering severe, incapacitating physical and mental breakdowns (it was considered so characteristic of Americans that William James, Harvard professor and brother of Henry James, called it ‘Americanitis’). Most historians now believe that there were numerous cultural factors that led to this “epidemic”, but it would not be an exaggeration to say that most prominent Americans at the time deeply feared this mysterious mental and physical weakening of American men (this would in turn, they believed, weaken the country, making it susceptible to invasion, etc.). All this is by way of saying that though doctors did not understand the causes of mental illness at the time, they were certainly aware that it could have physical repercussions. I feel confident that the experts brought in on this particular case would have considered this possibility.
Also, while I do agree that unwanted marriage could have been a trigger for such a psychological reaction, I think in this case we do not know enough about the patient’s background to make a generalization that a marriage would have been formally or informally “arranged.”. The consultation of so many experts from this time suggests to me that 1) this was a relatively wealthy patient, and/or 2) that the patient’s condition was so unusual that it attracted medical attention. This is important because negotiations of marriage at this time depended very much on socio-economic status, class, race, and numerous other factors. Certain groups, what would have been termed “classes,” of people would certainly have been involved in more “arranged” marriages because of family reasons, religion, etc. But we just don’t know in this case.
The other possibility that occurred to me was that marriage might have been prevented because there was no possibility of consummating the marriage or having children. Depending on how the illness was presenting, doctors could have made this diagnosis. I can think of many circumstances where this would have led to the dissolution of an engagement.
Another follow-up
From Alan Hawk, Collections Manager in the Historical Division:
"The problem with your diagnosis is that spinal muscular atrophy shows up in infancy and most patients die within the first couple of years of his or her life.
A couple of possibilities.
1) This might be an early case of polio, which would account for the sudden onset and “abruptly prevented matrimony.” On the other hand it is a highly infectious disease so one would think that other doctors would have seen other examples of these symptoms.
2) This could also be a psychological conversion reaction. If the patient was severely depressed, he or she could have become paralyzed. That would account for the normal muscle tissue as there would be nothing physically wrong with the patient other than the fact that he or she convinced herself that he or she was paralyzed. The triggering event could have been either the upcoming matrimony or its ‘prevention’ as the bride and the groom frequently had little say in who they ultimately married. This would also explain why the patient was apparently the only case.
While doctors of the time would not been able to diagnose either case, Polio existed as a diagnosis since 1840, but it cause would be unknown until 1908. While depression was recognized as a disorder (melancholia) since ancient times, it wasn’t until the late twentieth century that it symptoms, causes and effects were understood. However, physicians of the time had a good grasp of anatomy and, if the muscle appeared normal, the spinal cord was the next logical place to look. It sounds like the doctors intuitively understood the problem was psychological."
"The problem with your diagnosis is that spinal muscular atrophy shows up in infancy and most patients die within the first couple of years of his or her life.
A couple of possibilities.
1) This might be an early case of polio, which would account for the sudden onset and “abruptly prevented matrimony.” On the other hand it is a highly infectious disease so one would think that other doctors would have seen other examples of these symptoms.
2) This could also be a psychological conversion reaction. If the patient was severely depressed, he or she could have become paralyzed. That would account for the normal muscle tissue as there would be nothing physically wrong with the patient other than the fact that he or she convinced herself that he or she was paralyzed. The triggering event could have been either the upcoming matrimony or its ‘prevention’ as the bride and the groom frequently had little say in who they ultimately married. This would also explain why the patient was apparently the only case.
While doctors of the time would not been able to diagnose either case, Polio existed as a diagnosis since 1840, but it cause would be unknown until 1908. While depression was recognized as a disorder (melancholia) since ancient times, it wasn’t until the late twentieth century that it symptoms, causes and effects were understood. However, physicians of the time had a good grasp of anatomy and, if the muscle appeared normal, the spinal cord was the next logical place to look. It sounds like the doctors intuitively understood the problem was psychological."
A follow up: Today's letter of the day
It appears that Dr. Leale first contacted Dr. Huntington on October 17, 1883. He sent the doctor “a piece of the left gastrocnemius muscle taken from a patient having that very rare disease progressive muscular atrophy.” Leale had been the patient’s physician for six months and evidently the case had generated considerable interest in the medical community. Leale mentions consulting in excess of 11 prominent doctors who claimed they had never seen such a case. Because of the great interest in the case, Leale asked Huntington to do a microscopic examination done “to aid in the scientific investigation of one of the vexed unsolved problems on the pathology of muscular degeneration and perhaps the general paresis of the insane.”
Huntington wrote to Leale on October 20th, requesting a piece of the spinal column, to aid the investigation. On November 9, Huntington wrote to Leale with the results of the microscopic investigation. His letter:
November 9, 1883
Dear Sir:
The piece of the left gastrocnemius muscle removed from a patient suffering from progressive muscular atrophy has been examined under the microscope.
With the exception of a small inter deposit of adipose tissue and a slight increase of the cell elements of the interstitial tissue, the general appearance of the muscle was normal.
The change in the connective tissue had not yet proceeded sufficiently far to strangle the fibre, thereby producing atrophy, as the following measurements of six contiguous fibres will show:
.04, .031, .019, .031, .025, .038mm
The extreme measurements of normal fibre are stated to be .0113, .0563, mm.; therefore the measurements in the fibre before us come quite close to the mean.
It is to be regretted that a portion of the spinal cord was not preserved in which the lesion could probably have been shown more accurately.
Very respectfully,
You obed’t servt,
D.L. Huntington
Acting Surgeon General
Today’s letter of the day (November 10) is Dr. Leale’s reply. Given Dr. Huntington’s interest in the brain and spinal cord, my guess is that this patient had what we now know as spinal muscular atrophy, which I believe is genetic and was perhaps relatively new within the medical community (at least in the U.S.). Anyone out there who has any other ideas, feel free to let me know.
As for the “melancholy surroundings” and the “abruptly prevented matrimony” mentioned in Leale’s letter: Within the cultural parameters of the time, and without knowing too much about the patient, I can say generally that if this patient was female and the man she was marrying was financially secure and could afford medical care, it is possible they could have married (if her husband was willing to care for an “invalid wife”). If the patient was male it would be very unlikely, nearly unheard of, for him to marry, as he would be considered a “burden” to his wife and in death could leave her financially destitute, brokenhearted, etc. I don’t know the duration of this illness, after it first presents, but it is likely that when it did present in this case (possibly four years earlier), the parents of the patient or fiancée would have demanded an end to any engagement. I can imagine that doctor’s would not have known how long the patient would live and might have discouraged marriage for multiple reasons. When the patient lived for another four years, the parent(s) who encouraged or demanded the dissolution of the engagement might have regretted the decision.
Huntington wrote to Leale on October 20th, requesting a piece of the spinal column, to aid the investigation. On November 9, Huntington wrote to Leale with the results of the microscopic investigation. His letter:
November 9, 1883
Dear Sir:
The piece of the left gastrocnemius muscle removed from a patient suffering from progressive muscular atrophy has been examined under the microscope.
With the exception of a small inter deposit of adipose tissue and a slight increase of the cell elements of the interstitial tissue, the general appearance of the muscle was normal.
The change in the connective tissue had not yet proceeded sufficiently far to strangle the fibre, thereby producing atrophy, as the following measurements of six contiguous fibres will show:
.04, .031, .019, .031, .025, .038mm
The extreme measurements of normal fibre are stated to be .0113, .0563, mm.; therefore the measurements in the fibre before us come quite close to the mean.
It is to be regretted that a portion of the spinal cord was not preserved in which the lesion could probably have been shown more accurately.
Very respectfully,
You obed’t servt,
D.L. Huntington
Acting Surgeon General
Today’s letter of the day (November 10) is Dr. Leale’s reply. Given Dr. Huntington’s interest in the brain and spinal cord, my guess is that this patient had what we now know as spinal muscular atrophy, which I believe is genetic and was perhaps relatively new within the medical community (at least in the U.S.). Anyone out there who has any other ideas, feel free to let me know.
As for the “melancholy surroundings” and the “abruptly prevented matrimony” mentioned in Leale’s letter: Within the cultural parameters of the time, and without knowing too much about the patient, I can say generally that if this patient was female and the man she was marrying was financially secure and could afford medical care, it is possible they could have married (if her husband was willing to care for an “invalid wife”). If the patient was male it would be very unlikely, nearly unheard of, for him to marry, as he would be considered a “burden” to his wife and in death could leave her financially destitute, brokenhearted, etc. I don’t know the duration of this illness, after it first presents, but it is likely that when it did present in this case (possibly four years earlier), the parents of the patient or fiancée would have demanded an end to any engagement. I can imagine that doctor’s would not have known how long the patient would live and might have discouraged marriage for multiple reasons. When the patient lived for another four years, the parent(s) who encouraged or demanded the dissolution of the engagement might have regretted the decision.
Letter of the Day: November 10
C.A. Leale, M.D.
749 Fifth Avenue.
New York
D.L. Huntington, M.D.
A. Surgeon General, U.S.A
Dear Doctor
Please accept my sincere thanks for the microscopied examination report just received.
In this instance it was utterly impossible to secure the brain and spinal cord on account of the extremely melancholy surroundings. The death scene was very harrowing to the parent who four years ago abruptly prevented matrimony.
Very respectfully,
Your Obedt Servant
Charles A. Leale
Nov. 10, 1883
749 Fifth Avenue.
New York
D.L. Huntington, M.D.
A. Surgeon General, U.S.A
Dear Doctor
Please accept my sincere thanks for the microscopied examination report just received.
In this instance it was utterly impossible to secure the brain and spinal cord on account of the extremely melancholy surroundings. The death scene was very harrowing to the parent who four years ago abruptly prevented matrimony.
Very respectfully,
Your Obedt Servant
Charles A. Leale
Nov. 10, 1883
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Letter of the Day: November 9 (2 of 2)
Curatorial Records: Numbered Correspondence 1171
War Department,
Surgeon General’s Office,
Washington, Nov. 9, 1895.
My dear Doctor:-
I am not aware that anything has been done with reference to the souring of hams, to which you refer. It is an interesting subject of investigation and I shall be glad to know what results you arrive at. If you could send one of the hams by express to me I would have some investigations made in the laboratory at the Army Medical Museum in this city.
Very truly yours,
(Signed) Geo. M. Sternberg.
Dr. W.T. White,
Kansas City Medical College,
Kansas City, Missouri.
Letter of the Day: November 9 (1 of 2)
Fort Wadsworth D.T.
Nov. 9th, 1868
Surgeon General U.S.A.
Washington, D.C.
General:
I have since my communication of the 5th uls. explored two Tumuli and obtained a few bones, very incomplete parts of a number of skeletons seventeen tibiae, twenty one femura etc, etc, but no crania. From one I obtained about a peck of decayed wood, which had been used in interring the bones. I propose to disinter the remains of a hostile Indian (Dakota) who died of syphilis while a prisoner during the “Outbrake” [sic]. I would respectfully inquire if you desire the specimens for the museum?
I have a “Medicine Bag,” (parflesh bag) the skin of an otter, which I purpose to contribute. I have been preparing a map, or rather designating the location of the tumula on the map of the reservation, which with a description of the location, from and structure of the mounds I shall forward hereafter.
May I inquire if the implements we shipped on the 5th ult. have reached you.
Very Respectfully
Your Obed’t Servt
A. J. Comfort
Nov. 9th, 1868
Surgeon General U.S.A.
Washington, D.C.
General:
I have since my communication of the 5th uls. explored two Tumuli and obtained a few bones, very incomplete parts of a number of skeletons seventeen tibiae, twenty one femura etc, etc, but no crania. From one I obtained about a peck of decayed wood, which had been used in interring the bones. I propose to disinter the remains of a hostile Indian (Dakota) who died of syphilis while a prisoner during the “Outbrake” [sic]. I would respectfully inquire if you desire the specimens for the museum?
I have a “Medicine Bag,” (parflesh bag) the skin of an otter, which I purpose to contribute. I have been preparing a map, or rather designating the location of the tumula on the map of the reservation, which with a description of the location, from and structure of the mounds I shall forward hereafter.
May I inquire if the implements we shipped on the 5th ult. have reached you.
Very Respectfully
Your Obed’t Servt
A. J. Comfort
Monday, November 8, 2010
Von Hagens is selling the plastinated body, and BTW animals as home decorations on his site.
I think we should get the head, its only 30k.
Happy birthday, x-rays!
Google reminds us that today is the 115th anniversary of the history of x-rays. I know there are some interesting and disturbing images on the museum's flickr pages, many more than the two linked to here.
Letter of the Day: November 8
Ira Harris General Hospital
Albany, N.Y., Nov. 8th, 1865
Sir:
I have the honor to state that I have this day forwarded to your address, for the Army Medical Museum, a box containing an album of photographs of morbid specimens + necrosed bones removed from patients treated in this hospital.
Attached to each specimen is a descriptive label upon a card.
The views in the album are taken from a collection of several hundred in my possession, being chiefly photographs of specimens in the Museum of the Albany Medical College, and in private collections.
Resp. Your Obdt. Servt.,
J.H. Armsby
Asst. Surg. U.S.V.,
in charge
[To] Brig. Gen. J.K. Barnes
Surgeon General U.S.A.
Washington, D.C.
Albany, N.Y., Nov. 8th, 1865
Sir:
I have the honor to state that I have this day forwarded to your address, for the Army Medical Museum, a box containing an album of photographs of morbid specimens + necrosed bones removed from patients treated in this hospital.
Attached to each specimen is a descriptive label upon a card.
The views in the album are taken from a collection of several hundred in my possession, being chiefly photographs of specimens in the Museum of the Albany Medical College, and in private collections.
Resp. Your Obdt. Servt.,
J.H. Armsby
Asst. Surg. U.S.V.,
in charge
[To] Brig. Gen. J.K. Barnes
Surgeon General U.S.A.
Washington, D.C.
Sunday, November 7, 2010
Letter of the Day: November 7
Ft. Concho, Texas
Nov. 7. 76.
My dear Sir-
I deferred replying to yr. last kind letter until some explorations, which I have undertaken, were concluded. I had discovered a number of ancient Indian graves 30 miles from Concho. I regret to say they proved to be too ancient. The remains having mostly crumbled away. After several days hard + dangerous work, I was only rewarded with a few fragmentary specimens which I will forward on a future occasion.
However, this is only one point. I have ascertained numerous localities, at no great distances, where I have little doubt of being more amply repaid for my exertions. It necessarily occupies time, having to leave the post for a day or two, which is not always feasible. Before Spring I trust you will concede I have done well. I know of several murderer’s and outlaws’ graves + propose sending some of their calvaria.
I wd [would] not have thus forwarded the Apache skeleton, but that it was so perfect. I dreaded an accident. Moreover any other method in Texas is slow and not remarkably safe.
More anon from,
Yrs. ever most truly,
J.H.T. King.
Surg. Geo. A. Otis. U.S.A.
Nov. 7. 76.
My dear Sir-
I deferred replying to yr. last kind letter until some explorations, which I have undertaken, were concluded. I had discovered a number of ancient Indian graves 30 miles from Concho. I regret to say they proved to be too ancient. The remains having mostly crumbled away. After several days hard + dangerous work, I was only rewarded with a few fragmentary specimens which I will forward on a future occasion.
However, this is only one point. I have ascertained numerous localities, at no great distances, where I have little doubt of being more amply repaid for my exertions. It necessarily occupies time, having to leave the post for a day or two, which is not always feasible. Before Spring I trust you will concede I have done well. I know of several murderer’s and outlaws’ graves + propose sending some of their calvaria.
I wd [would] not have thus forwarded the Apache skeleton, but that it was so perfect. I dreaded an accident. Moreover any other method in Texas is slow and not remarkably safe.
More anon from,
Yrs. ever most truly,
J.H.T. King.
Surg. Geo. A. Otis. U.S.A.
Saturday, November 6, 2010
Letter of the Day: November 6
Washington, Nov. 6, 1875.
Dear Doctor
I spoke to you some time ago about making a selection of at least a single series of skulls, to represent the various tribes of aborigines of North America, for exhibition at the Centennial, either by the Army Medical Museum or by the National Museum.
I would like to hear from you to know whether you will make this display; as I consider it extremely important that the very large ethnological collection to be exhibited on that occasion, should be supplemented by the series in question.
We will gladly receive the specimens here, + be responsible for their safe return, + arrange to exhibit them under suitable circumstances, of course as the property of the Army Medical Museum.
Any other method will suit us equally well, only we hope the exhibition will be made. We are now unpacking a collection of about 300 crania from the vicinity of Santa Barbara + the adjacent islands – a most magnificent series of specimens, + we would be glad to have you come over + look at them + see whether you wish them turned over to the Army Medical Museum, + whether you have space for their accommodation. Many more are yet due.
Yours truly,
Spencer F Baird
Dr. Otis,
Army Medical Museum,
Washington, D.C.
Dear Doctor
I spoke to you some time ago about making a selection of at least a single series of skulls, to represent the various tribes of aborigines of North America, for exhibition at the Centennial, either by the Army Medical Museum or by the National Museum.
I would like to hear from you to know whether you will make this display; as I consider it extremely important that the very large ethnological collection to be exhibited on that occasion, should be supplemented by the series in question.
We will gladly receive the specimens here, + be responsible for their safe return, + arrange to exhibit them under suitable circumstances, of course as the property of the Army Medical Museum.
Any other method will suit us equally well, only we hope the exhibition will be made. We are now unpacking a collection of about 300 crania from the vicinity of Santa Barbara + the adjacent islands – a most magnificent series of specimens, + we would be glad to have you come over + look at them + see whether you wish them turned over to the Army Medical Museum, + whether you have space for their accommodation. Many more are yet due.
Yours truly,
Spencer F Baird
Dr. Otis,
Army Medical Museum,
Washington, D.C.
Friday, November 5, 2010
Walter Reed medical center and Army Medical School cartoon
| Reeve 43604 | Army Medical School, Walter Reed Hospital, Officer of the Day. [Illustration. Cartoon.] |
This cartoon is almost incomprehensible to us now, so I’ll do a quick read of what I think it means. The Walter Reed medical center baby is trying to reach a toy labeled for the Army Medical School Officer of the Day – implying I think that the hospital base wanted administrative control over the medical school, which had moved onto the campus in 1907. The school eventually became the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research and will be our neighbor when we move up to Forest Glen, Md next year.
Letter of the Day: November 5
Curatorial Records: Numbered Correspondence 1171
Kansas City Medical College
Kansas City, MO., Nov 5” 1895
Dr Geo M Sternberg
Washington D.C.
Dear Sir:-
Your communication at hand I would have been willing to acted as partner in your laboratory but since thee is no opening of any kind, I can only thank you and say I am sorry.
I am now trying to investigate the cause of “hog hams souring” Swift + Co one of our packers looses (sic) about $8000\00 per annum and I am quite sure it is due to bacterial origin. I have worked two weeks without making much headway and have six weeks left until I make a report. If you will kindly express me any literature on the subject I will take excellent care thereof, and return at your pleasure + my expense. Hoping you can help me I am yours very truly
WT White
17 + Bellview
K.C. Mo
Thursday, November 4, 2010
Post on medic's gear
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/special/nation/a-heavy-burden-graphic/index.html?sid=ST2010110104926
Letter of the Day: November 4 [Criminal edition, part 2]
Curatorial Records: Numbered Correspondence 01779
November 4, 1896
To the
Surgeon General, U. S. Army,
Washington, D.C.
General:
The Museum has a specimen of excised testicle from a military convict, John J. Moore, who was admitted to the hospital at Alcatraz Island, California, November 25, 1892, with subacute orchitis; testicle excised December 7; Discharged from Hospital December 22, 1892.
It would be interesting in connection with the specimen to learn the history of the patient subsequent to his discharge from the Hospital on December 22, 1892, and I would therefore respectfully request that an inquiry be made at the Adjutant General’s Office for such late data as may be on record in the case of Moore.
Very respectfully,
D.L. Huntington
Deputy Surgeon General, U.S. Army
In charge of Museum and Library Division
November 4, 1896
To the
Surgeon General, U. S. Army,
Washington, D.C.
General:
The Museum has a specimen of excised testicle from a military convict, John J. Moore, who was admitted to the hospital at Alcatraz Island, California, November 25, 1892, with subacute orchitis; testicle excised December 7; Discharged from Hospital December 22, 1892.
It would be interesting in connection with the specimen to learn the history of the patient subsequent to his discharge from the Hospital on December 22, 1892, and I would therefore respectfully request that an inquiry be made at the Adjutant General’s Office for such late data as may be on record in the case of Moore.
Very respectfully,
D.L. Huntington
Deputy Surgeon General, U.S. Army
In charge of Museum and Library Division
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)